Same here - or at least the times have propagated there. However, I have one ward that appears to have entered their time incorrectly.Alan_Brown wrote:As of this morning, the meeting times for all the wards in my stake are finally correct.
Meeting Time changes aren't propogating
-
- Community Administrator
- Posts: 34492
- Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:53 pm
- Location: U.S.
Have you searched the Help Center? Try doing a Google search and adding "site:churchofjesuschrist.org/help" to the search criteria.
So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.
So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.
-
- Community Moderators
- Posts: 3183
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:48 pm
- Location: California
Same here. I'm now only waiting for updates to the LUWS. Some of the ward's sites are correct and some are not.Alan_Brown wrote:As of this morning, the meeting times for all the wards in my stake are finally correct.
Have you read the Code of Conduct?
- aebrown
- Community Administrator
- Posts: 15153
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:48 pm
- Location: Draper, Utah
I was announcing that my meeting times were correct on LUWS (see the post title). So I guess it's not "Same here."Techgy wrote:Same here. I'm now only waiting for updates to the LUWS. Some of the ward's sites are correct and some are not.
But hopefully the widespread reports of LUWS meeting times updating are an indication that the process is well underway.
One caution -- is there any chance those wards updated their meeting times while on MLS 3.1.2? That might be the reason some wards' LUWS are not updating, as indicated in this post.
-
- Church Employee
- Posts: 2371
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:12 am
- Location: South Jordan, UT, USA
Good point. Those that have sent me unit numbers to review look like they are all correct in LUWS now. I'm wondering if they missed the cutoff of the data push for Friday and now were there for Saturday. I'll be doing some more research tomorrow on that and post the results.Alan_Brown wrote:One caution -- is there any chance those wards updated their meeting times while on MLS 3.1.2? That might be the reason some wards' LUWS are not updating, as indicated in this post.
-
- Community Moderators
- Posts: 11476
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:27 pm
- Location: US
Good news. Three that were correct in CDOL are now correct in LUWS (except for one bad input by a unit).Alan_Brown wrote:As of this morning, the meeting times for all the wards in my stake are finally correct.
More good news. One that was not correct in CDOL is now correct in both CDOL and LUWS. They must have been late submitters.
Other news. I still have one that is wrong in CDOL and LUWS. I suspect it is probably still wrong in MLS. I will check there first.
Bad news. One that was correct in CDOL is still not correct in LUWS. Perhaps some are still in progress. Will check again tomorrow.
So we only have one unit left may still be in process. We hope.
Thank you for keeping us informed.
-
- Member
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 7:11 pm
- Location: Wiesbaden, Germany
Thanks for your help with this. My LUWS now has the correct time.ryan jones wrote:Good point. Those that have sent me unit numbers to review look like they are all correct in LUWS now. I'm wondering if they missed the cutoff of the data push for Friday and now were there for Saturday. I'll be doing some more research tomorrow on that and post the results.
-
- Church Employee
- Posts: 2371
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:12 am
- Location: South Jordan, UT, USA
-
- Church Employee
- Posts: 2371
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:12 am
- Location: South Jordan, UT, USA
The LUWS refreshes its data from CDOL at 1:00 am. I'm guessing (still asking around) that the refresh from CDOL hasn't completed by that time so LUWS gets its 'updated' data from a day old copy. That would be why it takes the second day to get to LUWSryan jones wrote:So far from what I am seeing from the units that people have sent me is that there is an extra day of lag. So the changes from MLS make it into CDOL and then about 2 days later are in LUWS. I'm still trying to track down the complete process to see where the delays are coming from.
-
- Community Moderators
- Posts: 11476
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:27 pm
- Location: US
No sooner said than done. By morning this one was updated in LUWS.lajackson wrote:Will check again tomorrow.
So we only have one unit left may still be in process. We hope.
We now have two left to fix that I can confirm are entirely our problem. CDOL and LUWS both say exactly what is in MLS. Fancy that!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3908
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:17 am
- Location: Cumming, GA, USA
I updated our times again on Sunday. It showed up in CDOL within 15 minutes. Just this morning it showed up in LUWS, consistent with the 2 day lag others have seen.ryan jones wrote:The LUWS refreshes its data from CDOL at 1:00 am. I'm guessing (still asking around) that the refresh from CDOL hasn't completed by that time so LUWS gets its 'updated' data from a day old copy. That would be why it takes the second day to get to LUWS