Responsibility for Prospective elders

Some discussions just don't fit into a well defined box. Use this forum to discuss general topics and issues revolving around the Church and the technology offerings we use and share.
pabla1
New Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:46 am

Responsibility for Prospective elders

Postby pabla1 » Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:02 am

In a letter (attached) dated 3 November 2004 the First Presidency states responsibility for the progress of prospective elders is the high priests. Is this still the case ? - I can't find a letter to say that it has been discontinued. I am aware that Handbook 2, 7.6.1 states "Quorum and group leaders have the responsibility to help prospective elders prepare to receive the Melchizedek Priesthood.
Attachments
High Priests' Responsibillity for Prospective Elders.pdf
(162 KiB) Downloaded 26 times

User avatar
sbradshaw
Senior Member
Posts: 3357
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:42 pm
Location: Provo, UT
Contact:

Re: Responsibility for Prospective elders

Postby sbradshaw » Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:17 am

Yes, this is still the case. In Leader and Clerk Resources, prospective elders are assigned to the high priests by default.
Samuel Bradshaw • If you desire to serve God, you are called to the work.

eblood66
Senior Member
Posts: 2450
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:17 am
Location: Cumming, GA, USA

Re: Responsibility for Prospective elders

Postby eblood66 » Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:57 am

Handbook 2 was published after that letter so it supersedes it. According to the section you quoted the bishop counsels with the EQ and HP to determine who can best meet their needs. However, as sbardshaw indicates there are some effects of the letter because when a default assignment is needed (like when a prospective elder moves in or is first ordained to the Aaronic priesthood) they are assigned to the HP group. But that assignment should be reviewed and possibly changed as needed.


Return to “General Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest