Sacrament Tools
- AdrianLP-p40
- Member
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 12:29 pm
- Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Sacrament Tools
So a few years back I wrote a PHP/MySQL site that allowed a branch president to manage his sacrament meetings. He could record who would speak, their topics, who gave prayers, business, announcements, etc. Then he could view reports of the last date members spoke, gave prayers, when hymns were sung. And of course the site has different access levels. Pianists/choristers/music leaders can see the sacrament theme, and view and/or edit the hymns, the bulletin coordinator can see enough that they can create a bulletin, etc. Naturally only branch presidencies can view past/future business, assign prayers/speakers, and the like. Nobody can see information they shoud not have. On Sundays a Printer Friendly page allows branch presidencies to print off the meeting, carry it into church with them, and they have their bulletin containing all they need right in front of them.
Over the years this tool has been adopted by my district.
I think an official tool like this would be a wonderful idea. The branch presidents in my district seem to love it.
Over the years this tool has been adopted by my district.
I think an official tool like this would be a wonderful idea. The branch presidents in my district seem to love it.
- aebrown
- Community Administrator
- Posts: 15153
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:48 pm
- Location: Draper, Utah
Unofficial web site?
AdrianLP wrote:So a few years back I wrote a PHP/MySQL site that allowed a branch president to manage his sacrament meetings. . . . Over the years this tool has been adopted by my district.
I think an official tool like this would be a wonderful idea. The branch presidents in my district seem to love it.
Although this sounds like it could indeed be helpful if it were an official tool, it sounds to me like a clear violation of the prohibition on the creation of web sites other than the official stake/ward web sites hosted on lds.org. If there's a way to host such a site that is within policy, I'd love to hear how to do it.
- AdrianLP-p40
- Member
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 12:29 pm
- Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
I host it on a private server at the discretion of the district president.Alan_Brown wrote:Although this sounds like it could indeed be helpful if it were an official tool, it sounds to me like a clear violation of the prohibition on the creation of web sites other than the official stake/ward web sites hosted on lds.org. If there's a way to host such a site that is within policy, I'd love to hear how to do it.
The prohibition of website is that we should not have public websites, this does not fit that case. Having read the wording regarding websites, I think they are more concerned with incorrent and unofficial information being passed to the public.
-
- New Member
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:52 pm
- Contact:
- AdrianLP-p40
- Member
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 12:29 pm
- Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
- mkmurray
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:56 pm
- Location: Utah
- Contact:
Here's one response that may also apply to your situation: http://tech.lds.org/forum/showthread.php?p=8924AdrianLP wrote:I'd happily share it. Just waiting to see the admins reply regarding what church policy says.
- AdrianLP-p40
- Member
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 12:29 pm
- Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
I'm not sure that it does. Again they are referring to a publicly available site, one offering services that lds.org offers besides.mkmurray wrote:Here's one response that may also apply to your situation: http://tech.lds.org/forum/showthread.php?p=8924
My site does *not* represent the church to the public.
- WelchTC
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2085
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:51 am
- Location: Kaysville, UT, USA
- Contact:
The only guidance that has been delivered by the Church is guidance you have already read. At some level local leadership has to make the call whether they are violating policy or not. Where we tend to draw a firmer line is when we see people asking members of the ward to use a website, especially to store confidential or personal information.
Tom
Tom
- AdrianLP-p40
- Member
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 12:29 pm
- Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Right. But this is only used by branch presidencies and a few select leadership members they assign. The public doesn't / can't use this site. The only data that is stored is names (as manually typed by branch/ward presidencies), dates, and hymn names. We're not storing or using record numbers or anything of that nature. Although I had toyed with the idea of hashing a record number with branch name to generate a unique key for each individual. In this way we're still not storing the record number, or anything that can be reverse engineered to such.tomw wrote:The only guidance that has been delivered by the Church is guidance you have already read. At some level local leadership has to make the call whether they are violating policy or not. Where we tend to draw a firmer line is when we see people asking members of the ward to use a website, especially to store confidential or personal information.
- webmired-p40
- New Member
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:54 am
- Location: West Jordan
- Contact: