Budget Allocation disbursement methods

Discuss questions around local unit policies for budgeting, reconciling, etc. This forum should not contain specific financial or membership information.
atticusewig
Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:48 am

Budget Allocation disbursement methods

#1

Post by atticusewig »

I would be interested in knowing how many of the stakes
are disbursing Budget allocations to the wards using the
percent transfer method verses issuing checks.

In my Stake the Stake President sets the Stake to receive
100% of each ward's allocation, and then gives the ward an
specific amount via check once they get the most recent
Quarterly Reports submitted.

In my area it seems that many Stake Presidents do it this
way rather than using percentage method where a portion
of the allocation is automatically deposited into the ward's
bank account. Even the ones that do that, sometimes manipulate
each percentage so a specific amount is deposited. For example:

SP: "I want the 1st Ward to get to an allocation of $400 this quarter"

Clerk: "Okay, then that means I need to set the percentage to 43%,
and it will give them an allocation of $402.45"

I wonder why the percentage method is the only option, and why a
Stake President can't just put in a flat amount ? And if that option
was added, would it make any difference ? Also, if there were an
option to place a hold on a budget allocations being deposited until
quarterly reports are received, would Stake Presidents be more
likely to move away from paper checks ?

Unless someone from Church HQ is willing to share their information, can the forum
do a simple poll that asks the forum members if their stake:
1) Distributes Budget Allocations by Check ?
2) Distributes Budget Allocations by Percentage ?
3) Distributes Budget Allocations by Percentage to reach a specific amount
(i.e. playing with the percentage until it comes close to an amount like $400) ?
Gary_Miller
Senior Member
Posts: 1222
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:42 am
Location: Emmett, Idaho

Re: Budget Allocation disbursement methods

#2

Post by Gary_Miller »

Boy, talk about micro management!!!!!!!!!

My stake Distributes by percentage.
russellhltn
Community Administrator
Posts: 34384
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:53 pm
Location: U.S.

Re: Budget Allocation disbursement methods

#3

Post by russellhltn »

Under normal situations, I think by percentage is preferable. But if there has recently been a major boundary re-alignment, I can see why they would prefer a manual method until things settle down.

Most anything else I can think of could be done with percentages or with supplemental checks in addition to a basic percentage.
Have you searched the Help Center? Try doing a Google search and adding "site:churchofjesuschrist.org/help" to the search criteria.

So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.
eblood66
Senior Member
Posts: 3907
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Cumming, GA, USA

Re: Budget Allocation disbursement methods

#4

Post by eblood66 »

Gary_Miller wrote:Boy, talk about micro management!!!!!!!!!

My stake Distributes by percentage.
Percentages here too. In our previous stake (our ward was moved from one stake to a neighboring stake a few years ago) they also did it by percentages even before CUBS was released. I expect they still do.
jdlessley
Community Moderators
Posts: 9833
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:30 am
Location: USA, TX

Re: Budget Allocation disbursement methods

#5

Post by jdlessley »

My current stake issues a check. My past two stakes used the percentage. I think issuing a check puts a great deal of unnecessary work on the stake clerks.
JD Lessley
Have you tried finding your answer on the ChurchofJesusChrist.org Help Center or Tech Wiki?
User avatar
benjamincarleski
Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 5:03 pm
Location: Corvallis, OR, USA

Re: Budget Allocation disbursement methods

#6

Post by benjamincarleski »

My stake does it by percentage.
lajackson
Community Moderators
Posts: 11452
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: US

Re: Budget Allocation disbursement methods

#7

Post by lajackson »

We use percentage unless there is a boundary change, then we adjust percentage or pull it all back and write checks for the affected units.

One reason a stake might not wish to use a percentage is because every ward sees what the percentages are. If the stake is not sharing equally, they have to deal with that. Of course, wards can also compare notes when they receive their checks.

Percentages are easier to manage and seem to provide more equality to me. If there is a need for a special allocation, we cut a check on top of the regular percentage.
Gary_Miller
Senior Member
Posts: 1222
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:42 am
Location: Emmett, Idaho

Re: Budget Allocation disbursement methods

#8

Post by Gary_Miller »

lajackson wrote:One reason a stake might not wish to use a percentage is because every ward sees what the percentages are. If the stake is not sharing equally, they have to deal with that.
The whole idea of the budget allowance is that funds may not necessarily be distributed equally. For example a ward that has more senior citizens may not need as much money as a ward that has allot of youth. From the very beginning this was one of the principles in distributing funds.
allenjpl
Member
Posts: 341
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:26 am
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA

Re: Budget Allocation disbursement methods

#9

Post by allenjpl »

lajackson wrote:We use percentage unless there is a boundary change, then we adjust percentage or pull it all back and write checks for the affected units.

One reason a stake might not wish to use a percentage is because every ward sees what the percentages are. If the stake is not sharing equally, they have to deal with that. Of course, wards can also compare notes when they receive their checks.
The ward can see the percentages the ward took out from their own allocation, not anyone else's. Since the stele can set each ward separately, they'd still have to compare notes to learn about any inequality.
russellhltn
Community Administrator
Posts: 34384
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:53 pm
Location: U.S.

Re: Budget Allocation disbursement methods

#10

Post by russellhltn »

allenjpl wrote:The ward can see the percentages the ward took out from their own allocation, not anyone else's. Since the stele can set each ward separately, they'd still have to compare notes to learn about any inequality.
Well, if the ward can see the percentage, it seems to me to it might invite comparison on if the stake it taking too much. If the ward just gets a check, it's less visible. That's not to say it can't be calculated - it's just less visible.

A percentage is also much easier to compare between wards. An amount would have to compensate for a number of factors to decide if it was equal or not.
Have you searched the Help Center? Try doing a Google search and adding "site:churchofjesuschrist.org/help" to the search criteria.

So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.
Post Reply

Return to “Local Unit Finance”