Blogger - with info about New Family Search

Discussions around Genealogy technology.
dlongmore
New Member
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 7:51 pm
Location: Riverton,Utah
Contact:

Blogger - with info about New Family Search

Postby dlongmore » Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:02 am

I thought others might be interested in this link. It is Renee Zamora genealogy blog. Her blog "Multiple FamilySearch Beta Test Email" on 10-Feb-2007 indicates that she is someone who as able to provide insight on what is happening with progress on the "New Family Search" project.
http://rzamor1.livejournal.com/

Roger-p40
New Member
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:20 pm
Location: Lexington Kentucky

beta2

Postby Roger-p40 » Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:48 am

The problem with posting information and answering questions revolves around the fact that this is a beta test. I feel uneasy about discussing this with out prior approval. Maybe someone can help with this.

Roger

User avatar
WelchTC
Senior Member
Posts: 2088
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 7:51 am
Location: Kaysville, UT, USA
Contact:

Postby WelchTC » Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:22 pm

Roger wrote:The problem with posting information and answering questions revolves around the fact that this is a beta test. I feel uneasy about discussing this with out prior approval. Maybe someone can help with this.

Roger

I'm not familiar with the beta test program that the Family & Church History department is engaged with. However I highly recommend that anyone on a beta test program review their obligations and make sure that they abide by whatever policies they may have agreed to.

Tom

dlongmore
New Member
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 7:51 pm
Location: Riverton,Utah
Contact:

Please do not break any obligations

Postby dlongmore » Tue Feb 13, 2007 2:13 pm

I sincerely agree with Tom. Do not in anyway break an obligation that you have made. I also want say that having the idea of this forum is something I looked forward too immensely. In practice it has been somewhat disappointing. For this simple reason. There seem to be policy constraints in place that are preventing a free flow of information. I do not view myself as a prying person. It maybe best if I back off from giving my input in fear that I am treading on thin ice by asking. Someone please inform me if I am incorrect.

User avatar
WelchTC
Senior Member
Posts: 2088
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 7:51 am
Location: Kaysville, UT, USA
Contact:

Postby WelchTC » Tue Feb 13, 2007 3:42 pm

dlongmore wrote:I sincerely agree with Tom. Do not in anyway break an obligation that you have made. I also want say that having the idea of this forum is something I looked forward too immensely. In practice it has been somewhat disappointing. For this simple reason. There seem to be policy constraints in place that are preventing a free flow of information. I do not view myself as a prying person. It maybe best if I back off from giving my input in fear that I am treading on thin ice by asking. Someone please inform me if I am incorrect.

I do not know what the restrictions are with the beta being conducted by the FCH department. I just wanted to make sure that people make sure that they understand what their obligations are before they share information.

As far as this Web site beta...share all you want ;)

Tom

User avatar
mkmurray
Senior Member
Posts: 3241
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:56 pm
Location: Utah
Contact:

Postby mkmurray » Tue Feb 13, 2007 3:42 pm

dlongmore wrote:I sincerely agree with Tom. Do not in anyway break an obligation that you have made. I also want say that having the idea of this forum is something I looked forward too immensely. In practice it has been somewhat disappointing. For this simple reason. There seem to be policy constraints in place that are preventing a free flow of information. I do not view myself as a prying person. It maybe best if I back off from giving my input in fear that I am treading on thin ice by asking. Someone please inform me if I am incorrect.

Here's my perspective:

This is a Church website. Any page on a Church website could be considered endorsed and sponsored by the Church, these forums included. We do not want visitors to this site (member and non-member) to take people's comments as official policy or doctrine.

russellhltn
Community Administrator
Posts: 20762
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:53 pm
Location: U.S.

Postby russellhltn » Sun Feb 18, 2007 10:25 pm

FYI, the blogger in question is also a member of this forum using the same name. From what I've read in the past, I do believe she seeks permission on posting, or at least has in the past. I'll let her address this specific issue.


Return to “Family History”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest