I am in the midst of performing the annual membership audits in our stake. Each year when I do this, I always end up not being able to give an authoritative answer as to which rights each calling should have in MLS. Normally, this is what I tell the clerks:
Bishop & Ward Clerk
- Full administrator rights
Quorum/Group/Auxiliary Leaders
- Organization
Bishopric Counselors
- Finance
- Recommends
- Organization
- No View/Edit Membership
Executive Secretary
- Recommends
- Organization
- No Finance; No View/Edit Membership
Assistant Ward Clerks
If cross trained/used on finance and membership:
- Organization
- View/Edit Membership
- Finance
- No Recommend view rights
If not cross trained/used:
- Membership clerk doesn't have Finance
- Finance clerk doesn't have View/Edit Membership
Much of my reasoning is based on being consistent with the Access Table for online clerk resources. Can anyone point me to an authoritative source on access rights, or give me some suggestions on why my method might need to be modified?
Policy on MLS User Rights
- mlh78
- Member
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:03 pm
- Location: Texas, USA
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3907
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:17 am
- Location: Cumming, GA, USA
Re: Policy on MLS User Rights
I know of only two authoritative statements in regards to MLS rights. Neither one gives a specific list like you've outlined but they do provide guidance.
The first is Handbook 1 13.6 which indicates membership records should only be given the bishop or a clerk. We can infer that only Bishops and clerks should have View/Edit Membership rights because these rights give access to the full membership record.
The second is from the MLS Help (or the RKATS site). It indicates that users should only be given the rights they need to perform their calling.
Your list seems consistent with these statements and is pretty much what we do in my ward.
The first is Handbook 1 13.6 which indicates membership records should only be given the bishop or a clerk. We can infer that only Bishops and clerks should have View/Edit Membership rights because these rights give access to the full membership record.
The second is from the MLS Help (or the RKATS site). It indicates that users should only be given the rights they need to perform their calling.
Your list seems consistent with these statements and is pretty much what we do in my ward.
- mlh78
- Member
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:03 pm
- Location: Texas, USA
Re: Policy on MLS User Rights
Thanks for the feedback.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2859
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 6:06 pm
- Location: Plattsmouth, NE
Re: Policy on MLS User Rights
I had this same discussion with a ward clerk during his membership audit. He argued that the EQP and HPGL needed "edit membership" privileges, because they collect updated information during their visits to households. The clerk wants them to update the records with whatever they find.
I considered forcing him to remove those privileges, but I figured he would just change them back after I left. I also figured that the EQP and HPGL should be trusted to not mess things up.
I considered forcing him to remove those privileges, but I figured he would just change them back after I left. I also figured that the EQP and HPGL should be trusted to not mess things up.
Dana Repouille, Plattsmouth, Nebraska
- mlh78
- Member
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:03 pm
- Location: Texas, USA
Re: Policy on MLS User Rights
Not my stewardship, but I think you should strongly reconsider your approach. In my view, it is inappropriate for EQP and HPGL to be able to edit (and by extension view) membership records. If you are concerned about him changing them back, you should probably have a three person conversation about the policy with he and the bishop.drepouille wrote:I had this same discussion with a ward clerk during his membership audit. He argued that the EQP and HPGL needed "edit membership" privileges, because they collect updated information during their visits to households. The clerk wants them to update the records with whatever they find.
I considered forcing him to remove those privileges, but I figured he would just change them back after I left. I also figured that the EQP and HPGL should be trusted to not mess things up.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2859
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 6:06 pm
- Location: Plattsmouth, NE
Re: Policy on MLS User Rights
I agree with you. In this case, the ward clerk is about three times the new bishop's age, and has been a member of the church about 5 times longer than the bishop.
Still, that is a good idea.
Still, that is a good idea.
Dana Repouille, Plattsmouth, Nebraska
-
- Community Administrator
- Posts: 34421
- Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:53 pm
- Location: U.S.
Re: Policy on MLS User Rights
I'm not sure about the exact procedure of the audit, but I'd want the bishop to sign off on that.drepouille wrote:I had this same discussion with a ward clerk during his membership audit. He argued that the EQP and HPGL needed "edit membership" privileges, because they collect updated information during their visits to households. The clerk wants them to update the records with whatever they find.
Edit: I won't say the clerk's idea is without merit - just that the bishop should be part of the decision on how his unit is to be run.
Have you searched the Help Center? Try doing a Google search and adding "site:churchofjesuschrist.org/help" to the search criteria.
So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.
So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.
- mlh78
- Member
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:03 pm
- Location: Texas, USA
Re: Policy on MLS User Rights
That's a tough spot. Hopefully that age and experience will give him the wisdom to recognize his good bishop's keys.drepouille wrote:I agree with you. In this case, the ward clerk is about three times the new bishop's age, and has been a member of the church about 5 times longer than the bishop.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1222
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:42 am
- Location: Emmett, Idaho
Re: Policy on MLS User Rights
In order to start the conversion without causing problems just mark the audit question about MLS user rights no. Then a printout will appear that the bishop and the clerk must sign that goes to the stake. Hopefully this would cause the bishop to ask what the problem was then the floor would be all yours, with the backing of the handbook of instructions there should not be much problem.drepouille wrote:I had this same discussion with a ward clerk during his membership audit. He argued that the EQP and HPGL needed "edit membership" privileges, because they collect updated information during their visits to households. The clerk wants them to update the records with whatever they find.
I considered forcing him to remove those privileges, but I figured he would just change them back after I left. I also figured that the EQP and HPGL should be trusted to not mess things up.