Tithing refund
- aebrown
- Community Administrator
- Posts: 15153
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:48 pm
- Location: Draper, Utah
Well, that's a technical way to do it, but that doesn't mean it's acceptable from a policy perspective. If you can do that with this donation, you could do it with any donation, and refund missionary payments for a missionary who returns early. We've been specifically told that such donations are not to be refunded. So I think care needs to be exercised.mrrad wrote:Here's another thought. Create an "other" category as you would for pass-through funds (like money for Young Women Camp or a special Relief Society quilt project). Change the donation from tithing to this pass-through category. Then write a check back to the family. Presto! Done. The "donation" would never be considered charitable. On paper, it would be as if there was a special project and the "excess" funds for that project were refunded AND the special category's balance went back to zero.
This matter needs approval from CHQ
Questions that can benefit the larger community should be asked in a public forum, not a private message.
-
- Community Administrator
- Posts: 34487
- Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:53 pm
- Location: U.S.
aebrown wrote:This matter needs approval from CHQ
+1 (fill to keep the forum software happy.)
Have you searched the Help Center? Try doing a Google search and adding "site:churchofjesuschrist.org/help" to the search criteria.
So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.
So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.
-
- Community Moderators
- Posts: 9913
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:30 am
- Location: USA, TX
aebrown wrote:This matter needs approval from CHQ
+1 (fill to keep the forum software happy.)
JD Lessley
Have you tried finding your answer on the ChurchofJesusChrist.org Help Center or Tech Wiki?
Have you tried finding your answer on the ChurchofJesusChrist.org Help Center or Tech Wiki?
- gregwanderson
- Senior Member
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:34 pm
- Location: Huntsville, UT, USA
Certainly, the decision should be made by one higher in rank than a clerk, but at least using the "other" category would keep this problem away from the realm of fast offerings. If we accept that this was an honest mistake then I can't help feeling this isn't the first time someone made such a mistake. And, somewhere beneath "the letter of the law," giving back the money feels like the right thing to do. (And insisting on a long wait does not feel right).
As a financial clerk, I always watched ward missionary balances closely near the end and tried to let donors know that they were done paying BEFORE they made unnecessary donations. I felt it was my responsibilty, and it eliminated the need to sadly tell anyone that they made a non-refundable donation... as if it was entirely their fault. After all, I was the one watching the official balance every month.
As a financial clerk, I always watched ward missionary balances closely near the end and tried to let donors know that they were done paying BEFORE they made unnecessary donations. I felt it was my responsibilty, and it eliminated the need to sadly tell anyone that they made a non-refundable donation... as if it was entirely their fault. After all, I was the one watching the official balance every month.
- marianomarini
- Senior Member
- Posts: 619
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 3:13 am
- Location: Vicenza. Italy
- aebrown
- Community Administrator
- Posts: 15153
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:48 pm
- Location: Draper, Utah
mrrad wrote: (And insisting on a long wait does not feel right).
I haven't seen anyone insist on a long wait. The clerk could have called Local Unit Support hours ago; I see no reason why the issue could not be resolved very quickly. Be careful and following policy does not have to take significantly longer. The needs of the member should be carefully considered, but this can be done by following policy and getting proper guidance from CHQ -- and it can be done promptly.
Questions that can benefit the larger community should be asked in a public forum, not a private message.
-
- Community Administrator
- Posts: 34487
- Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:53 pm
- Location: U.S.
mrrad wrote:Certainly, the decision should be made by one higher in rank than a clerk, but at least using the "other" category would keep this problem away from the realm of fast offerings. If we accept that this was an honest mistake then I can't help feeling this isn't the first time someone made such a mistake. And, somewhere beneath "the letter of the law," giving back the money feels like the right thing to do. (And insisting on a long wait does not feel right).
The problem is this is a community forum and we don't know if it's acceptable or not. There is a possibility of Tax Law in this and none of us are tax lawyers. Thus the answer so far has been to contact LUS. I would not want anyone to get the idea of reclassifying donations as "other" as being a means to work around the "no refund" policy is OK until someone at CHQ says it's OK. And as Alan noted, it may depend on the situation.
In this case, I'd say the decision needs to be made by CHQ as to how to handle it. Anything else could land you (and the church) in trouble.
Have you searched the Help Center? Try doing a Google search and adding "site:churchofjesuschrist.org/help" to the search criteria.
So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.
So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.
- gregwanderson
- Senior Member
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:34 pm
- Location: Huntsville, UT, USA
I agree that calling headquarters is the ONLY valid suggestion in this discussion. The only reason I suggested changing the donation to an "other" category was to improve upon the suggestion made immediately before my post (and others) which involved making a mess of the Fast Offering category. To turn this into a Fast Offering issue would be to create a storyline on paper which is much farther from the truth than anything I suggested.
I would be very disappointed if we don't get a follow-up on this forum when someone finds out exactly how headquarters officially wants to clear this up.
I would be very disappointed if we don't get a follow-up on this forum when someone finds out exactly how headquarters officially wants to clear this up.