Pilotfly wrote:I sincerely hope that was a misquote on the part of the stake clerk up in Canada. I cannot imagine anything more painful than having to have a second person nearby in order to write a check. For me, and I imagine quite a few other folks, that will entail some real issues. None of my Stake Presidency is in the same ward as I so it will necessarily require an extra evening or time before stake meetings to get check printing done (which takes away from their valuable time).
We may be jumping the gun on this and I certainly hope so. However if this really is a coming feature of CUBS then I intend through my Stake President and Area Seventy to see if we can't get this feature stopped. We already have enough security inherant in the system with two signatures needed on a check and approval of either the Stake President in my case or a Bishop for everyone else at ward levels before a check is ever disbursed. Sorry, but this feature of needing two people to print a check just doesn't make sense.
Sorry if I am jumping the gun, but when I read this in the two posts above my heart sunk.
Nope, not a misquote. Now works just as it does when doing a deposit - you now need two people to authorize printing cheques. Perhaps there have been problems with people forging signatures? I am fortunate that my financial clerk and I are in the same Ward.