67 Action Items in the Local FHC? - Transmitted payments of $5.50 not clearing bank

Discuss questions around local unit policies for budgeting, reconciling, etc. This forum should not contain specific financial or membership information.
Post Reply
dheilner
New Member
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 8:39 pm

67 Action Items in the Local FHC? - Transmitted payments of $5.50 not clearing bank

#1

Post by dheilner »

We are trying to move the handling of FHC finances from the Local Unit to the Stake, and with that, we need to close the bank account for the local FHC. However, on the CUBS report, there are 67 Action items relating to payments in the Other category between Nov 2010 through Aug 2011 that all look similar to this:

Reference Date Description Amount
862599 13 Jan 2011 MMD SL Microfilm Distribution (5.50)

It says at the top of CUBS, "A payment was transmitted by your unit that has not yet cleared the bank. Please follow up with the intended recipient on those disbursements over 60 days old."

I don't know why these all haven't cleared the bank. They don't look like checks that were written in MLS and have no idea how to fix them. Has anyone seen this before?
User avatar
aebrown
Community Administrator
Posts: 15153
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:48 pm
Location: Draper, Utah

#2

Post by aebrown »

dheilner wrote:I don't know why these all haven't cleared the bank. They don't look like checks that were written in MLS and have no idea how to fix them. Has anyone seen this before?

Those are direct charges for microfilm orders, so they've certainly cleared the bank. It's just an accounting issue on the CUBS end. At this point all you can do is contact Local Unit Support.
Questions that can benefit the larger community should be asked in a public forum, not a private message.
dheilner
New Member
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 8:39 pm

#3

Post by dheilner »

Appreciate your assistance. I called Local Unit Finance, who directed me to the Accounting Department. The Acc Dept was able to resolve, as we discovered the charges were not to a 3rd party, but to the church.

Thanks,
Post Reply

Return to “Local Unit Finance”