Who should handle this?
When an email is broadcast from the ward via lds.org, AOL is treating ldschurch.org group email broadcasts as spam.
AOL message: CON Blocks 554 CON:B1 The IP address has been blocked due to a spike in unfavorable e-mail statistics.
-Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [mailto:MAILER-DAEMON@ldschurch.org]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 9:22 PM
To: SUPPRESS@verizon.net
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
The original message was received at Mon, 9 Sep 2013 19:21:47 -0600 from
chqpvuu4241.ldschurch.org [10.98.110.121]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<SUPPRESS@aol.com>
(reason: 521 5.2.1 : (CON:B1)
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554conb1.html)
<SUPPRESS@aol.com>
(reason: 521 5.2.1 : (CON:B1)
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554conb1.html)
<SUPPRESS@aol.com>
(reason: 521 5.2.1 : (CON:B1)
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554conb1.html)
<SUPPRESS@aol.com>
(reason: 521 5.2.1 : (CON:B1)
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554conb1.html)
----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to
mailin-01.mx.aol.com.:
>>> DATA
<<< 521 5.2.1 : (CON:B1)
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554conb1.html
554 5.5.0 Remote protocol error
AOL blocking ldschurch.org
-
- Member
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 6:52 pm
- Location: Branchburg, NJ USA
-
- Member
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:35 pm
- Location: Ranchita, CA USA
Re: AOL blocking ldschurch.org
It's possible that the problem is not the "from", but the number of "to"s. I believe that AOL is not the only one that does this.
-
- Member
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 6:52 pm
- Location: Branchburg, NJ USA
Re: AOL blocking ldschurch.org
There were only 4 email addrs to aol.com (suppressed the names to protect the innocent). I would be surprised if 4 would trip a spam alarm...
- sbradshaw
- Community Moderators
- Posts: 6261
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:42 pm
- Location: Utah
- Contact:
Re: AOL blocking ldschurch.org
As ggllbb says, it's probably the number of recipients that flags it as spam, or maybe the fact that it's "undisclosed recipients."ggllbb wrote:It's possible that the problem is not the "from", but the number of "to"s. I believe that AOL is not the only one that does this.