Secure Data Fields

Discussions around using and interfacing with the Church MLS program.
User avatar
mkmurray
Senior Member
Posts: 3241
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:56 pm
Location: Utah
Contact:

Secure Data Fields

Postby mkmurray » Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:05 pm

How come I can see age and priesthood office while using MLS on some screens like browsing the Elders Quorum membership, but I cannot see those same field when viewing or printing custom reports? It tells me somthing like I don't have sufficient rights, but obviously I do in some circumstances.

Thanks in advance.

User avatar
mkmurray
Senior Member
Posts: 3241
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:56 pm
Location: Utah
Contact:

Postby mkmurray » Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:57 pm

Anybody have a guess?

russellhltn
Community Administrator
Posts: 20729
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:53 pm
Location: U.S.

Postby russellhltn » Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:11 pm

Just wild ideas. Most anyone running of lists for Priesthood is going to need to know the office held. But if you were to run off a general ward list, I can see where that might be considered sensitive. I think that has to be kicked back to the developers to see if MLS is acting "as designed" or if this a bug somewhere.

I'm assuming you don't have administrative rights - if you do then something is acting up because you should be able to see everything.

User avatar
mkmurray
Senior Member
Posts: 3241
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:56 pm
Location: Utah
Contact:

Postby mkmurray » Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:08 pm

RussellHltn wrote:I'm assuming you don't have administrative rights - if you do then something is acting up because you should be able to see everything.

Correct. I am an EQ Secretary. I have no clue what rights have been set up for me. I just expected there to be consistency, but I can see how what you are saying may be "as designed."

User avatar
mkmurray
Senior Member
Posts: 3241
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:56 pm
Location: Utah
Contact:

Postby mkmurray » Thu Jan 10, 2008 11:33 am

RussellHltn wrote:I think that has to be kicked back to the developers to see if MLS is acting "as designed" or if this a bug somewhere.

Church Developers,

Any comments on this bug and/or feature that I have described would be appreciated. Thank you.

User avatar
Mikerowaved
Community Moderators
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:56 am
Location: Layton, UT

Postby Mikerowaved » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:26 pm

I'm not sure how much I'm allowed to post, as this gets a bit into the security aspect of the program, so someone please stop me if this isn't kosher.

I setup a test account where an individual can only access the "Organization", which is basically how EQ, HP, RS, Primary, etc. accounts are setup and played with it for a bit. I could access individual records with only a few of the areas not showing up, but there is definitely quite a bit of information there that could be considered sensitive. Are these needed for the above listed callings? Not in my very tiny opinion. Maybe birthdays.

What's disturbing about the Custom Reports is it allows you to use criteria you don't have privileges for. For example, "Member Status IS Endowed". As long as the Custom Report Format doesn't have any sensitive fields selected, like just the name and address, the report runs without a hitch. Hummm... this isn't right.
So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.

User avatar
mkmurray
Senior Member
Posts: 3241
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:56 pm
Location: Utah
Contact:

Postby mkmurray » Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:35 pm

Mikerowaved wrote:I setup a test account where an individual can only access the "Organization", which is basically how EQ, HP, RS, Primary, etc. accounts are setup and played with it for a bit. I could access individual records with only a few of the areas not showing up, but there is definitely quite a bit of information there that could be considered sensitive. Are these needed for the above listed callings? Not in my very tiny opinion. Maybe birthdays.

As an EQ Secretary, I can come up with many situations where it could be justified that I (or more likely the Presidency) need(s) such information as Priesthood Office, Age, Birthday, Is Endowed, etc. And obviously from my very first post, I have rights to most of that already when looking at the EQ membership tab. But when I do a custom report with the same data fields, magically I don't.

User avatar
mkmurray
Senior Member
Posts: 3241
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:56 pm
Location: Utah
Contact:

Postby mkmurray » Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:39 pm

mkmurray wrote:As an EQ Secretary, I can come up with many situations where it could be justified that I (or more likely the Presidency) need(s) such information as Priesthood Office, Age, Birthday, Is Endowed, etc.

More specific to my first post in the thread, I needed to give President a list of Prospective Elders in the quorum. I couldn't find that report already made somewhere, so I did a custom report. But what good is the report if I have a bunch of names and I can't see the Priesthood office. All I know is they made it into the report. Age is important as well when talking about somebody who is not really on par as far as priesthood office is concerned with others of their same age.

User avatar
Mikerowaved
Community Moderators
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:56 am
Location: Layton, UT

Postby Mikerowaved » Thu Jan 10, 2008 11:11 pm

I guess my example wasn't very good. What I was trying to emphasize is MLS will allow you to search on criteria that you aren't allowed to view in your report. For example, find all Deacons over the age of 18, but then not let you see that they hold the office of Deacon in the report. (Obviously, they are all Deacons.) That's the part that doesn't make sense to me from a security/privacy point of view. Besides being able to readily see this very same information in other areas of MLS that you aren't allowed to view in a custom report (as you pointed out). Doesn't seem consistent to me either.


In our unit the EQ Pres. has a bit of extra privilege letting him run the kind of reports you were referring to that his counselors and secretary can't. This most likely follows the guidelines from HQ when setting up accounts in MLS. (I know, probably not what you wanted to hear, but I'm not going to comment on their policies.) I guess the only work-around for you is to have your president run the report.
So we can better help you, please edit your Profile to include your general location.

User avatar
mkmurray
Senior Member
Posts: 3241
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:56 pm
Location: Utah
Contact:

Postby mkmurray » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:47 am

Mikerowaved wrote:What I was trying to emphasize is MLS will allow you to search on criteria that you aren't allowed to view in your report. For example, find all Deacons over the age of 18, but then not let you see that they hold the office of Deacon in the report. (Obviously, they are all Deacons.) That's the part that doesn't make sense to me from a security/privacy point of view. Besides being able to readily see this very same information in other areas of MLS that you aren't allowed to view in a custom report (as you pointed out). Doesn't seem consistent to me either.

I whole-heartily agree. I would have accepted my restrictive permissions if they had been consistent.
Mikerowaved wrote:In our unit the EQ Pres. has a bit of extra privilege letting him run the kind of reports you were referring to that his counselors and secretary can't. This most likely follows the guidelines from HQ when setting up accounts in MLS.

Can you refer me to which guideline you are talking about? Thanks.


Return to “MLS Support, Help, and Feedback”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest