HP Roll includes Elders?

Discussions around using and interfacing with the Church MLS program.
unixguy
New Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:43 pm

HP Roll includes Elders?

Postby unixguy » Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:17 am

ETA: This was a false alarm!
**********************************

I don't know if this is a bug or just something that was set up wrong-- as I was doing our quarterly report I printed a HP roll to compare it against the names of "non-attendees" that the HP GL had provided. I discovered that a number of Elders are being included in the HP roll.

I know that when you define a Primary or SS class you can specify criteria for this class, so that MLS can generate the rolls automatically-- I was unable to find a similar feature for PH rolls (nor would I have expected to).

So my question is-- why would a number of Elders have been included on the HP roll? This is with MLS 2.4.? if that helps.

User avatar
childsdj
Community Moderators
Posts: 258
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 9:51 am

Postby childsdj » Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:27 am

I think I remember something with that in 2.4.2 but it was fixed in 2.6 if I remember right. I would suggest getting on 2.6 or getting on the 2.7 beta at mls.lds.org.

User avatar
HaleDN
Church Employee
Church Employee
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:08 pm
Location: Herriman, Utah, USA
Contact:

Postby HaleDN » Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:21 am

A few years ago there was a policy change where all prospective elders were grouped under the high priests rolls. Can you confirm that these are active elders?

SmithGW
Community Moderators
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:42 am

Postby SmithGW » Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:34 am

I'm not sure what your position in your ward is, but it sounds like you are a clerk. It is possible to add names to the High Priest rolls in MLS. Often an older elder will meet with the high priests without being a high priest simply because they are his peers and he doesn't feel at home with younger elders. Has your high priest group leader or secretary added these elders deliberately because they meet with the high priests? It is a possibility.

danpass
Member
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: Oregon City, OR
Contact:

Postby danpass » Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:51 am

smithgw wrote:I'm not sure what your position in your ward is, but it sounds like you are a clerk. It is possible to add names to the High Priest rolls in MLS. Often an older elder will meet with the high priests without being a high priest simply because they are his peers and he doesn't feel at home with younger elders. Has your high priest group leader or secretary added these elders deliberately because they meet with the high priests? It is a possibility.


As a former ward clerk, I know that an elder can be assigned to the HP quorum in MLS. This makes him show up on rolls and hometeaching assignments/lists under the HP group. Our ward currently has 4 or 5 elders which have been assigned in this way under the bishop's direction. I believe that MLS administrator rights are required to make such assignments.

russellhltn
Community Administrator
Posts: 20732
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:53 pm
Location: U.S.

Postby russellhltn » Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:00 pm

haledn wrote:A few years ago there was a policy change where all prospective elders were grouped under the high priests rolls. Can you confirm that these are active elders?


Prospective elders grouped with High Priests? I can see doing that in some situations, but not automatically. Normally I'd think they'd be on the Elder's roll.

unixguy
New Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:43 pm

False alarm, I'm going to go hide my face for a while

Postby unixguy » Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:25 pm

Wow, go get a hair cut and run a few errands and there's already a bunch of replies! Thanks everybody!

I think I need a "color me embarrassed" smilie-- it turns out that I had misread one of the names on the list and thought the PE that was listed was actually his father (who is an Elder), and another man who I thought was an Elder is still a PE.

I appreciate the thoughts and advice you gave!

SmithGW
Community Moderators
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:42 am

Postby SmithGW » Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:24 am

In reference to the comments concerning prospective elders being listed with the high priests: the First Presidency sent out a letter to stakes and wards dated November 3, 2004 that stated "Effective immediately, responsibility for the progress of prospective elders is transferred to the high priests. Where there are no high priests or insufficient numbers of them, the elders quorum will retain this responsibility." MLS was changed accordingly to comply with this directive.

User avatar
charly3358-p40
New Member
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:09 am
Location: Sydney Australia

Postby charly3358-p40 » Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:53 am

smithgw wrote:In reference to the comments concerning prospective elders being listed with the high priests: the First Presidency sent out a letter to stakes and wards dated November 3, 2004 that stated "Effective immediately, responsibility for the progress of prospective elders is transferred to the high priests. Where there are no high priests or insufficient numbers of them, the elders quorum will retain this responsibility." MLS was changed accordingly to comply with this directive.



This is true. (And it was a world-wide change)

User avatar
thedqs
Community Moderators
Posts: 1038
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:53 am
Location: Redmond, WA
Contact:

Postby thedqs » Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:28 am

smithgw wrote:In reference to the comments concerning prospective elders being listed with the high priests: the First Presidency sent out a letter to stakes and wards dated November 3, 2004 that stated "Effective immediately, responsibility for the progress of prospective elders is transferred to the high priests. Where there are no high priests or insufficient numbers of them, the elders quorum will retain this responsibility." MLS was changed accordingly to comply with this directive.


Of course perspective elders should still go to the Elder's quorum right? Which is why I think there was confusion on why the names were on the roll for HP.
- David


Return to “MLS Support, Help, and Feedback”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cspinfo@telus.net and 1 guest