Page 1 of 1

Home teaching reporting/mls

Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 10:46 am
by llasater
Can auxiliary leaders enter home teaching/visiting teaching from computers other than the clerks office?

Re: Home teaching reporting/mls

Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 11:39 am
by russellhltn
llasater wrote:Can auxiliary leaders enter home teaching/visiting teaching from computers other than the clerks office?
Not currently. That will change sometime this quarter (unless the time slips again). Even then, it will be a decision made by the ward or stake before you'll be allowed to do that.

Re: Home teaching reporting/mls

Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 2:14 pm
by mwtoupin
By "auxiliary leaders" are you including priesthood leadership as well?

Re: Home teaching reporting/mls

Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 2:27 pm
by mwtoupin
I was just reading in the forum on LCR that once a ward uses the LCR system for HT/VT it will no longer be available in MLS. Since that seems to be what you are saying also, do you know if that can be done on a ward by ward basis in a stake, i.e. only one or two wards using LCR and the rest of the stake using MLS?

Re: Home teaching reporting/mls

Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 2:58 pm
by russellhltn
mwtoupin wrote:I was just reading in the forum on LCR that once a ward uses the LCR system for HT/VT it will no longer be available in MLS. Since that seems to be what you are saying also, do you know if that can be done on a ward by ward basis in a stake, i.e. only one or two wards using LCR and the rest of the stake using MLS?
I'm not aware of any announcement on that. It may not have been decided yet.

Re: Home teaching reporting/mls

Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 10:29 pm
by llasater
Thanks for your help. I thought that was the case with it coming out the first quarter. I'll wait to see it on the MLS messages or from the stake.

One other question real quick....
[Moderator note: This separate question was moved to a new topic Ward Clerk signing checks? Please follow the Code of Conduct and "Do not start a new topic in an existing thread; instead start a new thread."]