Proposal: Official Church Wiki

[marianomarini]

It's meaningless if it's not official.

Meaningless of what?
I cited it just as test opportunity. Why it will be not worth of it?

[joshuao2]

Unofficial testing ground...undesired correlation department involvement... I am proposing something bigger. Again, I am not aware of a better place to post a wiki idea, but I would fully expect church leadership to get involved if this were to be implemented right, and well.

[jdlessley]

...undesired correlation department involvement... I would fully expect church leadership to get involved ....

You won't get the latter without the former.

[joshuao2]

I don't think the correlation department's involvement is undesired - I was stating the view I'm hearing here so far. The correlation department might have to be changed to fit this; that is my point.

[marianomarini]

My point of view is that wiki is mean for "community cooperation". Why then have a wiki site if it's an official one? Meaning that only corporate stuff can contribute?
On the other side, there will be need for approved and certified (doctrinal speaking) members to delegate moderator work!
This sound like a "calling"!
The model could be this:
1. GA decide wich doctrine, or issues in general, are approuved to be part of the wiki.
2. Only registered member can contribute to the content of it.
3. Calling, as priesthood leaders, moderators to manage the contribute.
4. Establish an audit Commitee to periodically verify as things going on.

[joshuao2]

I like to define a wiki only by its organization - hyperlinked webpages by topic. I agree that a process like that would be necessary. While it would be good to talk about the best process, perhaps we should try to figure out how to get someone higher up than forum members involved?