boomerbubba wrote:Another factor with respect to the letter and intent of church policy on such external sites is that mfarley's resource calendar is being published to the whole world, not just to the authenticated members of the stake as in the LUWS resource calendar.
Aurhoritative interpretation of church policy here should come from the stake president. The key question is whether he has approved this.
Good point.. The Stake President is going to have his first look this weekend. I'll see if he has any feedback as to the privacy of the content.
As it stands now it's bare minimum -- just a time and room #, no personal information (no names, phone #'s, etc).
Even without publishing the calendar, the request form is a great tool in itself for receiving scheduling requests.