ward websites
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:21 am
Lets clear things up, about this 2004 letter, as the more people talk about it the more confusing and unfocused it gets. Im not posting this to cause problems, but just to be sure im not doing anything wrong.
The LUWS and the building schedule tools created by the church are not available to the UK yet, and probally will not for some time. Therefore the letter talks about no websites, which i agree with, and i would think they mean published websites available to the world.
We have a ward calendar, we call it the "Intranet" because its only available to the wards and those with USERNAME and PASSWORD it does not even have a domain name, it availble through a mac me account. There is published nothing about the church on it. And the second one we have again is password'd so only the members of our buidling can access it, and its a simple form to fill out, to request the building. No talk of the church, you would not even know its to request a mormon church.
Am i safe to say this is OK? Theres the letter of the law and the spirit of the law. I have read that letter and the way i see it, is all websites published on the internet should be removed. But i dont see password and username intranets as a public website, and because we have no other option available to us. Am i breaking any church policy?
The LUWS and the building schedule tools created by the church are not available to the UK yet, and probally will not for some time. Therefore the letter talks about no websites, which i agree with, and i would think they mean published websites available to the world.
We have a ward calendar, we call it the "Intranet" because its only available to the wards and those with USERNAME and PASSWORD it does not even have a domain name, it availble through a mac me account. There is published nothing about the church on it. And the second one we have again is password'd so only the members of our buidling can access it, and its a simple form to fill out, to request the building. No talk of the church, you would not even know its to request a mormon church.
Am i safe to say this is OK? Theres the letter of the law and the spirit of the law. I have read that letter and the way i see it, is all websites published on the internet should be removed. But i dont see password and username intranets as a public website, and because we have no other option available to us. Am i breaking any church policy?