eqideaexchange.com - is this model fundamentally flawed?
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 10:29 pm
Hi,
I build a site (eqideaexchange.com) as a collaborative tool for EQ presidents to share ideas, documents, templates, etc. The idea is to create a knowledge base so that each successive EQ president isn't reinventing the wheel trying to get organized or develop programs.
So far I haven't had much success driving contributions to the site. I've even contacted EQ presidents directly via email and gotten a luke warm response. It seems like the newbies are very interested in a site like this. But the veterans (i.e. those who actually have stuff to contribute) seem to already have things figured out and don't seem to have much use for this site.
Is the idea behind this site fundamentally flawed? If not, under what conditions can a site like this suceed? I'm interested to get people's take on this.
I still think this is a great idea and would have loved to have had something like this to refer to when I was first called as an EQ president. But it will never be a very compelling destination unless I can build up the content base. And so far, that's proven very challenging.
How the heck do they get all those people to contribute to wikipedia???!!!
Thanks in advance for any suggestions!
- Doug
I build a site (eqideaexchange.com) as a collaborative tool for EQ presidents to share ideas, documents, templates, etc. The idea is to create a knowledge base so that each successive EQ president isn't reinventing the wheel trying to get organized or develop programs.
So far I haven't had much success driving contributions to the site. I've even contacted EQ presidents directly via email and gotten a luke warm response. It seems like the newbies are very interested in a site like this. But the veterans (i.e. those who actually have stuff to contribute) seem to already have things figured out and don't seem to have much use for this site.
Is the idea behind this site fundamentally flawed? If not, under what conditions can a site like this suceed? I'm interested to get people's take on this.
I still think this is a great idea and would have loved to have had something like this to refer to when I was first called as an EQ president. But it will never be a very compelling destination unless I can build up the content base. And so far, that's proven very challenging.
How the heck do they get all those people to contribute to wikipedia???!!!
Thanks in advance for any suggestions!
- Doug