Page 1 of 2

Stake Calling not able to see youth in other wards

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:03 pm
by comptong
I am the Stake Y/M President on the MLS and I cannot see the Y/M in wards other than my own.

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:14 pm
by russellhltn
You may want to ask the stake clerk to verify that your calling is entered as a standard (not custom) calling.

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 12:25 pm
by lisaan
This is by design. The Stake YM president is over the Ward YM presidencies. The logic is you would work with the presidencies and not directly with the youth.

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 1:31 pm
by russellhltn
LisaAn wrote:This is by design. The Stake YM president is over the Ward YM presidencies. The logic is you would work with the presidencies and not directly with the youth.

I'm curious about the verbiage in the directory help file: "a member without a stake calling won't see the children in a household outside of his or her ward. However, a member of the stake Primary presidency will see children in all wards and branches in the stake."

It raises the question of which stake callings do allow the member to see children. (And I'm curious as to how the Stake Primary President is different from the Stake YM President.)

Either way, I think the help file could use some tweaking.

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 1:57 pm
by gyoungberg
I know this won't change anything, but I too have been frustrated by this. I'm the high council adviser to the Young Women. I've also served as the Stake Trek Committee chairman. In both of these assignments I would be much more effective if I could look up the name of youth that I'm working with in LDS Tools. I just don't have the memory that I once had, but often know the family they belong to. I understand privacy concerns, but this seems too strict.

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 1:59 pm
by mevans
RussellHltn wrote:I'm curious about the verbiage in the directory help file: "a member without a stake calling won't see the children in a household outside of his or her ward. However, a member of the stake Primary presidency will see children in all wards and branches in the stake."
If the above is the case, then what does the privacy setting do? I can choose to make my children visible to leaders only, just the ward, or the whole stake. Do I take that to mean that there is no general stake visibility for children? If so, why does the option exist?

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 2:08 pm
by aebrown
mevans wrote:Do I take that to mean that there is no general stake visibility for children? If so, why does the option exist?

One slight effect of the option is that when they turn 18 that visibility setting will become effective. But other than that, it does seem that only stake leaders (apparently defined as stake presidency, clerks, and executive secretary) outside the ward can see the children, and thus there is no difference between "ward" and "stake" visibility settings.

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 2:11 pm
by russellhltn
mevans wrote:If the above is the case, then what does the privacy setting do? I can choose to make my children visible to leaders only, just the ward, or the whole stake. Do I take that to mean that there is no general stake visibility for children? If so, why does the option exist?

I'm sure there are differences between "Leadership" and the other settings. It would block visibility to other members of the ward.

I don't know as there would be any difference between "Stake" and "Ward" until they turn 18.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 2:18 pm
by mevans
RussellHltn wrote:I don't know as there would be any difference between "Stake" and "Ward" until they turn 18.

I'm assuming you mean until the a child reaches the age of majority based on where he or she lives? It's not 18 in all countries. I just googled and was surprised to realize that in the US it can differ by state.

Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 2:24 pm
by aebrown
mevans wrote:I'm assuming you mean until the a child reaches the age of majority based on where he or she lives? It's not 18 in all countries. I just googled and was surprised to realize that in the US it can differ by state.
Although you raise a good point, I don't know if that affects the way this is actually implemented. I really doubt that there is any difference in the US for different states.